Back to overview
Active Federal MDL
MDL No. 3081 , U.S. District Court for Arizona

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit

The Bard PowerPort catheter, implanted under the skin, is facing lawsuits over defects that cause it to migrate or fracture, leading to internal vascular damage in patients.

Last updated May 25, 2026

2 primary sources
3,000+

ACTIVE CASES

Up to $1M

TOP ESTIMATE

59%

RISK OF COMPLICATION

1-6 yr*

STATUTE WINDOW

 Search

OVERVIEW

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Overview

What is Bard PowerPort?

A catheter device implanted under the skin for easy intravenous delivery of fluids and medication.

Bard PowerPort Injuries

Users have reported fractures of the device, leading to migration, blood clots, and deep vein thrombosis, among other complications.

Liability of Manufacturer

Product liability claims allege the company failed to adequately warn about the potential risks and harms associated with the device.

Who is eligible?

Individuals who had a Bard PowerPort implanted and suffered serious health damages due to device fractures or migration.

CLAIMS IN AMERICA

The Complete Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Guide

2026 EDITION

FREE PDF • 47 PAGES

The Complete Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Lawsuit Guide

Everything you need to know about the litigation, explained clearly by legal and medical experts.

How Bard PowerPort injuries occur
Legal rights & claim eligibility
Signs of device failure and complications
What evidence strengthens your case
No sign-up required
Search

LITIGATION PROGRESS

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Timeline

April 2026

The first federal Bard PowerPort lawsuit is scheduled to begin trial in April 2026, with more bellwether trials to follow.

March 2026

A judge restricted what Bard’s FDA expert can testify to, a significant win for the plaintiff.

February 2026

A plaintiff selected for the bellwether trial passed away. The estate will now handle the claim after necessary adjustments.

January 2026

The 24th MDL Case Management Conference was held on February 19, 2026.

 Search

Estimated Payout

What Affects Your Claim

1

Documented Device Failure

The claim is strongly influenced by documented evidence that the Bard PowerPort catheter fractured, degraded, or migrated within the body.

2

Medical Record of Harm

Medical documentation showing harm such as thrombosis (blood clots), cardiac arrhythmia, or cardiac tamponade, directly linked to device failure.

3

Timing of Injury

The injury must have occurred within a few weeks or months after the Bard PowerPort was implanted.

*Claim outcomes depend on diagnosis, timing, and medical records. Similar cases may be valued differently based on each person’s circumstances.

Diagnostic Resources

Find a lab nearby

Locate certified MRI and neurology imaging centers to obtain the diagnostic records needed to support your claim.

Filter:
0 results near Chicago
sorted by distance
check

What to request : Ask for a contrast-enhanced brain MRI specifically looking for meningioma. Request both the radiologist's report and the imaging CD both are needed for your legal claim.

 Search

The process

How it works

From submission to attorney match, every case follows the same four-step review.

01
2 min

Submit your case

Answer a short questionnaire about Bard PowerPort use and injury.

02
2 hours

Initial review

A specialist reviews your submission and checks eligibility.

03
24 hours

Case manager call

You may be contacted to discuss medical history and records.

04
72 hours

Attorney match

If eligible, your case may be referred to a lawyer handling similar claim.

Free Case Evaluation

Check your eligibility today.

Estimated Range

$1M+

Start now
Free, no obligation
100% confidential
Takes ~3 minutes

Quick Facts

Defendant
Becton, Dickinson & Co.*
Product
Implanted catheter
Court
U.S. District Court for Arizona
MDL
3081
Cases filed
3,000+
*Becton, Dickinson & Co. is the parent company of C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Status
active

On This Page

Start now